It seems like every time I turn around, Joy Wade and Pretty In Pink Foundation are doing something amazing for local breast cancer survivors. Please come support their mission in the community by buying a ticket to this amazing event. Cancer survivors at all stages simply shine on stage. It's an amazingly uplifting experience, followed by one-heck-of-a FUN party. Don't miss out. Tickets sold out completely last year! Get your tickets early! Contact details on the picture.
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Friday, April 24, 2015
Have You Heard?: Coffee & Tamoxifen: Best Friends Forever!
Have You Heard?: Coffee & Tamoxifen: Best Friends Forever!
The "Have You Heard?" series from BLAT is meant to summarize developments in the breast cancer world. As always, be sure to consult a physician with any questions or concerns you have about your cancer care.
Have You Heard?: Coffee & Tamoxifen: Best Friends Forever!
Coffee lovers rejoice! A smartly designed study by researchers at Skane University Hospital and Lund University in Sweden and University of Bristol in the UK revealed that 2 cups of caffeinated coffee a day, in combination with Tamoxifen, the often-prescribed estrogen blocking therapy, works to reduce breast cancer recurrence rates by up to half (OHEMGEE!!!!) AND there's evidence that caffeine slows cancer cells growth in ER+ and ER- breast tumors. Now, there is a threshold. The study found that 2-5 cups of coffee were the key. A 1-cup a day habit was simply not enough (most mornings I'd agree!). The study found that women (more than 1,000 studied) with moderate to high coffee consumption had smaller invasive primary tumors, a lower proportion of ER+ tumors, and (the really big deal) a 49% lower risk for recurrence when combined with the hormone therapy Tamoxifen (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.97). Researchers believe the mechanism involved here is that the caffeine and caffeic acid found in coffee sensitizes the tumor cells to the Tamoxifen. And while this news is very exciting to coffee-loving breast cancer survivors, it's important to remember that over-consumption of coffee can cause insomnia, irritability, heart palpitations, and upset stomach. Everything in moderation, friends!
Have You Heard?: Coffee & Tamoxifen: Best Friends Forever!
Coffee lovers rejoice! A smartly designed study by researchers at Skane University Hospital and Lund University in Sweden and University of Bristol in the UK revealed that 2 cups of caffeinated coffee a day, in combination with Tamoxifen, the often-prescribed estrogen blocking therapy, works to reduce breast cancer recurrence rates by up to half (OHEMGEE!!!!) AND there's evidence that caffeine slows cancer cells growth in ER+ and ER- breast tumors. Now, there is a threshold. The study found that 2-5 cups of coffee were the key. A 1-cup a day habit was simply not enough (most mornings I'd agree!). The study found that women (more than 1,000 studied) with moderate to high coffee consumption had smaller invasive primary tumors, a lower proportion of ER+ tumors, and (the really big deal) a 49% lower risk for recurrence when combined with the hormone therapy Tamoxifen (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.97). Researchers believe the mechanism involved here is that the caffeine and caffeic acid found in coffee sensitizes the tumor cells to the Tamoxifen. And while this news is very exciting to coffee-loving breast cancer survivors, it's important to remember that over-consumption of coffee can cause insomnia, irritability, heart palpitations, and upset stomach. Everything in moderation, friends!
Here's the link to the full-text of the study: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/21/8/1877.full
Monday, April 20, 2015
Have You Heard?: ABUS
The "Have You Heard?" series from BLAT is meant to summarize developments in the breast cancer world. As always, be sure to consult a physician with any questions or concerns you have about your cancer care.
Have You Heard?: Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening (ABUS)
It's well established that even the most advanced mammography available fails to render effective diagnoses in women with dense breast tissue. Nearly 1/3 of cancers go undetected in patients with dense breast tissue. Young and middle-aged women most often have dense breast tissue which appears cloudy on mammography imaging, and can often obscure the view of tumors in the breast tissue. Ultrasound has long been used to supplement mammography in an effort to improve detection of breast cancer. Yet, even when used in combination, many women still don't get the correct diagnosis. My case is a perfect, and all too common, example. I had a mammogram and ultrasound. According to the radiologist's report, I had "micro-calcifications, likely benign" and should "return in 6 months for follow-up." 6 months would've LITERALLY meant the difference between life and death for me. Luckily, my PA was smart and thorough. She sent me to a breast surgeon (Dr. Elizabeth Weinberg, who just happens to be the BEST breast surgeon in South Eastern North Carolina!) where my lump was immediately biopsied, and found to be malignant. My dense breast tissue likely obstructed the view of what we later found out was a 5.5cm Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (the size of a lime). Cancer had already started to spread to my lymph nodes. If we had waited 6 more months for follow-up, I would've been stage IV, metastatic instead of stage IIIa. As of now, there is no cure for metastatic breast cancer, and sadly, very little research is done to cure cancer at this stage.
While it is maddening that little is done to develop a cure, or even to track the medical experiences of women and men with stage IV breast cancer, it's good to know that some R&D teams are still making breakthroughs that have the potential to help millions of women, particularly those with dense breast tissue. Enter GE:
GE Healthcare has developed the ABUS: Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening, an ultrasound device that is the only FDA approved ultrasound for screening dense breast tissue. Check out the image captions for details.
So, why isn't ABUS a standard part of the diagnostic protocol? The fight to include any ultrasound as an automatic part of diagnostic imaging for breast cancer has been a long one. Objections include cost and manpower. Many reports express fear that radiologists would be inundated with ultrasound patients because of the sheer number of women with dense breast tissue that are referred for diagnostic imaging each year. It should take a technician around 15 minutes per patient to obtain the ultrasound images, and then more time for the radiologist to read them. Given the amount of time that goes into the diagnostic process, the backlog at any given practice could become outrageous. Also, given the financial climate of our healthcare system, physicians are not in a position to afford the new equipment, or are forced to choose between a 3-D mammography (which is also being raved about for the quality of its imaging), and an ABUS when deciding on new imaging equipment for their practice.
Ultimately, advanced screening methods save lives. Early diagnosis leads to MUCH better outcomes for those facing a breast cancer diagnosis. In my opinion, young and middle-aged women with any indication that something is wrong should automatically have ultrasound included in their diagnostics, and it should be with a machine, like ABUS, that can improve detection of breast cancer in dense breast tissue.
Want to read more about ABUS? Check out: Elaine Schattner's article in Forbes, or go to GE Healthcare's website.
**all images on this post are property of GE Healthcare**
Have You Heard?: Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening (ABUS)
It's well established that even the most advanced mammography available fails to render effective diagnoses in women with dense breast tissue. Nearly 1/3 of cancers go undetected in patients with dense breast tissue. Young and middle-aged women most often have dense breast tissue which appears cloudy on mammography imaging, and can often obscure the view of tumors in the breast tissue. Ultrasound has long been used to supplement mammography in an effort to improve detection of breast cancer. Yet, even when used in combination, many women still don't get the correct diagnosis. My case is a perfect, and all too common, example. I had a mammogram and ultrasound. According to the radiologist's report, I had "micro-calcifications, likely benign" and should "return in 6 months for follow-up." 6 months would've LITERALLY meant the difference between life and death for me. Luckily, my PA was smart and thorough. She sent me to a breast surgeon (Dr. Elizabeth Weinberg, who just happens to be the BEST breast surgeon in South Eastern North Carolina!) where my lump was immediately biopsied, and found to be malignant. My dense breast tissue likely obstructed the view of what we later found out was a 5.5cm Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (the size of a lime). Cancer had already started to spread to my lymph nodes. If we had waited 6 more months for follow-up, I would've been stage IV, metastatic instead of stage IIIa. As of now, there is no cure for metastatic breast cancer, and sadly, very little research is done to cure cancer at this stage.
While it is maddening that little is done to develop a cure, or even to track the medical experiences of women and men with stage IV breast cancer, it's good to know that some R&D teams are still making breakthroughs that have the potential to help millions of women, particularly those with dense breast tissue. Enter GE:
GE Healthcare has developed the ABUS: Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening, an ultrasound device that is the only FDA approved ultrasound for screening dense breast tissue. Check out the image captions for details.
So, why isn't ABUS a standard part of the diagnostic protocol? The fight to include any ultrasound as an automatic part of diagnostic imaging for breast cancer has been a long one. Objections include cost and manpower. Many reports express fear that radiologists would be inundated with ultrasound patients because of the sheer number of women with dense breast tissue that are referred for diagnostic imaging each year. It should take a technician around 15 minutes per patient to obtain the ultrasound images, and then more time for the radiologist to read them. Given the amount of time that goes into the diagnostic process, the backlog at any given practice could become outrageous. Also, given the financial climate of our healthcare system, physicians are not in a position to afford the new equipment, or are forced to choose between a 3-D mammography (which is also being raved about for the quality of its imaging), and an ABUS when deciding on new imaging equipment for their practice.
Ultimately, advanced screening methods save lives. Early diagnosis leads to MUCH better outcomes for those facing a breast cancer diagnosis. In my opinion, young and middle-aged women with any indication that something is wrong should automatically have ultrasound included in their diagnostics, and it should be with a machine, like ABUS, that can improve detection of breast cancer in dense breast tissue.
Want to read more about ABUS? Check out: Elaine Schattner's article in Forbes, or go to GE Healthcare's website.
**all images on this post are property of GE Healthcare**
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)